There’s a moment every CHRO hits where the job quietly changes.
Your attention to detail, your responsiveness, your ability to solve problems fast… those are the exact traits that got you here.
But once you become a leader of leaders, those traits can turn into liabilities.
Because executive impact is no longer measured by what you personally solve.
It’s measured by what your organization believes, repeats, and executes at scale.
If you lead leaders, your communication is your operating system.
This article breaks down:
When you lead individual contributors, your influence is mostly one-to-one:
That works when you’re leading 6, 10, even 15 people.
But once you lead leaders, the math breaks.
You cannot coach 50 leaders individually. You cannot personally inspect every decision. And if you try, you become the bottleneck.
At this level, your job becomes leverage.
Here’s the simplest way to understand the difference:
A leader of people creates results through direct action. A leader of leaders creates results through shared meaning.
Your words become a lever.
One hour of communication to 50 leaders can influence thousands of hours of downstream work.
But only if you can create clarity, alignment, and belief.
CHROs lead the “human operating system” of the company.
That means your communication is often about:
These topics are abstract. They are emotional. And they can either stabilize the organization… or stall it.
Most executives can communicate facts:
CHROs must communicate meaning.
And when CHRO communication fails, it doesn’t just hurt morale.
It creates execution breakdown.
Because culture and trust are the soil everything grows in. If that soil is unstable, strategies don’t stick.
If you’ve ever thought, “I already communicated that”… you’ve met the permeation problem.
The permeation problem is the belief that because you said it, people heard it, understood it, and integrated it.
That is almost never true.
Messages permeate when they are:
If you want your message to scale, it needs a distribution system.
Your managers are that system.
If they can’t repeat your message simply, it never permeates.
Most CHROs didn’t get promoted for being “great on stage.”
They got promoted for being competent:
But executive communication rewards almost the opposite:
This is where many CHROs get stuck.
They lead with the details because it feels safe.
They over-explain to avoid being misunderstood.
They treat communication like information transfer instead of meaning creation.
And then they wonder why the message didn’t stick.
Here’s the tension CHROs must learn to hold:
You still need the details. But you can’t lead with them.
You carry them in your back pocket… while you lead with the why.
If you want a simple checklist for communication that scales, use this five-part model:
2. Use cascadable language This is the real test of clarity.
Can your direct reports repeat the message accurately in 2 minutes when you’re not in the room?
If not, your message is too complex.
3. Add emotional clarity Employees are not logic bots during change. They’re processing uncertainty, fear, hope, and tradeoffs.
Your message must acknowledge what people feel, not just what they need to do.
4. Repeat with freshness Permeation requires repetition. But you cannot read the same script six times.
Same core story. Different angles.
5. Lead with presence Presence is not performance.
It’s groundedness.
It’s decisiveness.
It’s credibility.
It’s the felt sense that you are steady, human, and clear.
Moment 1: The 20-slide town hall that no one remembers A CHRO spends weeks preparing a town hall deck. It’s detailed, logical, and packed with information.
The town hall goes well.
And two weeks later, employees still don’t know:
Because the message wasn’t built to permeate. It was built to explain.
Moment 2: The leadership team that keeps “interpreting” A CHRO communicates a strategy shift clearly (in their mind). But every HR leader repeats it differently.
Some emphasize compliance. Some emphasize culture. Some emphasize efficiency.
Now execution is fractured. Not because leaders are bad… but because the core story wasn’t cascaded.
Here’s the hard truth:
As you become a leader of leaders, you have to willingly sacrifice some nuance for the sake of clear, actionable meaning.
That doesn’t mean dumbing it down.
It means elevating it.
And the question every CHRO should ask is:
Am I spending my time solving one-off problems… or making meaning at scale?
Because that is the difference between managing a function and shaping a company.
FAQ (search-style)
For CHROs, CPOs and direct reports
50% Complete
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.