I rolled my eyes at HR leadership advice
(And now I wish I’d listened)
When I started, everyone kept saying:
And I thought, yeah, that makes sense. We’re a fast-growth company. I just need people with strong resumes and experience.
So that’s what I did.
It cost me.
I missed my numbers for the first time in my career.
I dreaded going into the office.
We had infighting, CYA behavior, and real toxicity spreading through the team.
Eventually, I had to turn over the entire group. All of it.
“Don’t hire for resume. Hire for attitude, aptitude, and appreciation.”
I thought I needed people who had been there and done that.
That a great resume meant a great hire.
That surrounding myself with people who understood the business better than I did was the safest move.
I was wrong.
The general managers I watched succeed across the country were not hiring the most decorated resumes.
They were hiring for:
They had been doing that from day one. And it worked.
People with a real “failure is not an option” attitude will always figure it out.
Business changes. Technology changes. Markets shift.
But attitude doesn’t expire.
Aptitude, the kind built on critical thinking and street smarts, travels with someone no matter what the environment throws at them.
And appreciation?
When someone genuinely sees the opportunity you’re giving them as a step up, they show up differently. Every single day.
Look at today.
Nobody has deep AI experience. Nobody.
So if you’re building your team around credentials and past titles, you’re optimizing for a world that no longer exists.
The people who will carry your organization forward are the ones who:
Not every underperformer is the wrong hire.
Some are.
But some are operating without the coaching, clarity, or development they actually need to perform.
The real question isn’t always:
“Do I need to move this person out?”
Sometimes it’s:
“Have I actually set this person up to succeed?”
Both questions matter.
And knowing which one applies takes more than a gut reaction.
Most CHROs I talk to eventually realize every team member falls into one of three buckets:
If you skip this step and jump straight to replacing people, you’ll keep repeating the same cycle.
When you look at your team right now, do you actually know why each person is performing at the level they are?
Is it a fit issue?
A support issue?
Or something in between?
And once you’re clear on that… what’s your next move?
Because keeping the wrong person too long is a problem.
But so is replacing the right person when the system is what’s broken.
It’s not awareness.
It’s having the space to step back, diagnose it clearly, and act with confidence.
That’s where I see peer groups make the biggest difference.
They don’t take time. They make time.
They help you see patterns faster, pressure test your thinking, and move without second guessing every decision.
If you’re looking at your team differently after reading this, you’re not alone.
This is exactly the kind of problem CHROs work through together inside the Mastermind.
For CHROs, CPOs and direct reports
50% Complete
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.